New Research in Journal of Medical Regulation Proposes Compassionate Response to Suicidality in Health Practitioners Under Regulatory Investigation

WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

(November 12, 2026) – New research published in the latest issue of the Journal of Medical Regulation (JMR) proposes a structured, compassionate response to health professionals experiencing emotional distress and suicidal ideation during the regulatory complaint process.

In the general scholarly article, The ANCHOR Framework: Responding Compassionately to Suicidality in Health Practitioners Under Regulatory Investigation, Manaan Kar Ray and colleagues outline a framework that aims to strengthen psychological safety, promote reflective growth, and help cultivate a more humane, learning-oriented regulatory system.

“The potential for suicide and emotional distress among healthcare professionals undergoing regulatory investigation is an area of increasing concern that is under-addressed,” said JMR Editor-in-Chief Mark Bechtel, MD. “As the authors note, although an appropriate regulatory response is essential to protect the public, these responses can have the unintentional effects of significantly increasing stress in health practitioners.”

In other articles:

Public transparency and trust in healthcare regulation is critical for continued public confidence and support of medical regulation. In the commentary, The Evolution of Community Participation in the Australian National Registration and Accreditation Scheme, Patricia Hall and co-authors discuss the evolution of community participation in the operation of the Australian National Registration and Accreditation Scheme that oversees 16 health professions in Australia.

International Medical Graduates (IMGs) play an important function in meeting the rural and remote physician workforce needs in Canada. In the original research article, Selection Criteria for International Medical Graduates in Rural Saskatchewan: A Survey-Based Investigation of Faculty Assessors and Rural Physician Leaders, Valiyah Khurshid and co-authors present a cross-sectional study of stakeholders involved in the Saskatchewan International Practice Assessment, which determines whether IMGs are ready to enter independent practice.

About the Journal of Medical Regulation

A quarterly, peer-reviewed publication, the Journal of Medical Regulation has been published continuously since 1913 by the Federation of State Medical Boards. The journal examines trends and topics of interest to the global community of medical regulators who protect the public’s health and safety through the licensing and disciplining of physicians and other healthcare professionals. Visit the JMR website at www.JMRonline.org.

About the Federation of State Medical Boards:

The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) is a national non-profit organization representing the medical boards within the United States and its territories that license and discipline allopathic and osteopathic physicians and, in some jurisdictions, other healthcare professionals. FSMB serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality healthcare and regulatory best practices. FSMB serves the public through Docinfo.org, a free physician search tool which provides background information on the more than 1 million doctors in the United States. To learn more about FSMB, visit www.fsmb.org.